Place an order for a custom essay, research paper on this or related subject.
A war that has been prevalent for decades was brought to light in the state of Massachusetts in October 2009 (Mass Resistance, 2009). It forever altered the way Americans and most parents perceive the role of the school and the state and not only in people’s lives but in the lives of the children. The Massachusetts State education committee convened in order to hear testimonies of parents on an immense and susceptible topic which involved sex education in public schools. The primary outrage for the parents came as a result of the fact that they were never informed on their children’s syllabus on the grounds they were not to intervene or opt the children out of the sex education. They were also not notified on intended curriculum that was to be taught in school. On similar accounts two families sued the school district when they refused to give them a chance in opting out when homosexuality was discussed in their children’s classes as they were after moral upbringing of their young children (Ian & Murphy, 2007). The legal entity in parents when they enroll the children in the public schools is to offer a substantial control degree on how the children are taught (Emily, 2009, pp. 114). The Supreme Court clearly stipulates that the care, custody and nurturing of the children sorely resides first with the parents whose role is to prepare for duties in which the state can neither hinder nor supply (Emily, 2009, pp. 114). It is evident that parents have been left out on crucial matters concerning their children’s upbringing. Parents need to unite against any barriers and entities which threaten to overrun their emotional, physical, mental and moral solidarity in their homes. The parents’ rights to protect their children beliefs and moral upbringing have been immensely treaded upon and if that is not enough, there have been no apologies offered on the same.
Public schools have been implementing controversial education for example sex education in the classrooms as a major part of instruction for many years (Steve, Nancy & Chet, 2006, pp. 496). There has been lack of empowerment on parents as they need to come strongly and discourage these classes. However, despite numerous trials, their sentiments have been falling on deaf ears. The reason why parents should come together and discourage these kinds of topics is because their children suffer from embarrassments from such topics and considering these classes are taught briefly, there is no sufficient time to relate such grave issues. It is also possible for these teachings to go against people’s religious and moral beliefs. Most of these public schools never teach on abstinence but rather on how to have a safe intercourse hence most family and religious values do stress on marriage before sex (Susan & Doreen, 2006, pp. 93). The teachers are never properly trained on how they should teach sexual education and hence may transgress their morals and beliefs into the topic instead of just sticking with the facts (Clint & Jerrold, 2008, pp. 42).
Though families might not be physically threatened in our recent time, it is lucid that in future, parents might have no any say as far as the well being of their children in schools is concerned. It is therefore crucial for everybody concerned and who cares about the mind of the young generation to fight for the rights of the parents since this invasion is quite real. The same institution that the parents are helping to fund with their taxes is stabbing them on their back. The young mind is invaded by outraging topics, lessons and discussions that are so irrelevant to them and the school system is acting so insensitive to the age of the people they are conveying this message to. The invasion of sexual and political agendas ought to be stopped with immediate effect. Teaching the small children about homosexuality and lesbianism and that there is nothing wrong with such doctrines and practices is irrational. It is unethical and immoral as it violates the basic American Rights. It violates the freedom of religion as well as pursuit of happiness in the family unit. Sex education plainly should be addressed to the senior high school and college level young adults and should be an optional subject to people interested (Don, 1970, pp. 107). It clearly does not belong to the kindergarten and the preschool children. This is because that is simply corrupting their mind with illogical information that adds no any value to them. Young people are bound to get confused by such information and they are not mature enough to make logical decisions on such topics. If public schools have to teach on controversial topics like homosexuality, then they should just teach on what it really is without getting into details on whether it is acceptable or not.
The Supreme Court establishes the rights of the parents in controlling the religious and moral upbringing of the children. It is completely unfounded for the Third Circuit of rights to affirm that the rights of parents do stop at school’s door (Emily, 2009, Pp. 116). Since the views on sexuality are usually inextricably linked to people’s religious and moral beliefs, parents’ main right should be to direct the upbringing of the children and to protect them from irrelevant exposure to some of the sexual subjects (Emily, 2009, pp. 124-125). The parent’s role in directing the decision of their children is usually immense when religious and moral precepts are concerned. The society expects the parents to fulfill their main role of being moral tutors because when they fail it is only them who are pointed and not the teachers. The rights of the parents in controlling the educational and moral upbringing is quite imperative and has also been supported by the court as parental care is completely indispensable to the health of a nation (Richard, 2000, pp. 120-22).
When parents are registering their children in various public schools, they should consider the regular curriculum that is being used. The parents have total rights over their children and should refuse any controversial classes offered. The public should come strongly to offer support to the parents and refuse any teachings on such divisive topics since the school can never change the curriculum basing on the ideologies of few parents.