Comparison of Leadership Models and Styles

Details:
Leadership models abound. For this assignment, you will have two parts submitted as one assignment. In Part One you will review an assortment of models and styles and make a comparison of servant leadership to other models of leadership, including at least one model of transformational leadership. Also, contrast how these models bring about change in organizations. In Part Two you will look at leadership styles, determine yours, and compare the results of the personal model inventory and your personal leadership style.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Complete the "Personal Model of Leadership" tool to find your personal model.
Complete the Leadership Development Questionnaire ("Leadership Development – Test One – What is your leadership style?").
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Write a 1,250-1,500 word paper that discusses how your personal model of leadership and leadership style may be applied in your work and how it compares to servant leadership and other models.
Part One:
1. Discuss your personal model of leadership and how you might apply it in your role as a doctorally prepared advanced practice nurse.
2. Analyze how your personal model reflects a practice of servant leadership.
3. Compare servant leadership to two other leadership models.
4. Discuss how leaders implement each of the models and how they fit with your personal model.
5. Contrast the effectiveness of these models to bring about change in an organization.
Part Two:
1. Evaluate how your personal model of leadership works in conjunction with your leadership style.
2. Develop an action plan using SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Relevant, and Timely) with an evaluation of personal development to work on two areas of personal improvement for your leadership style. The plan must include at least two SMART goals.

You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting.

See Grading Rubric Below:
Comparison of Leadership Models and Styles
70.0 % – Content
10.0 % – Discussion of Your Personal Model of Leadership and How You Might Apply It in Your Role as a Doctorally Prepared Advanced Practice Nurse
– Discussion of your personal model of leadership and how you might apply it in your role as a doctorally prepared advanced practice nurse is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 % – Analysis of How Your Personal Model Reflects a Practice of Servant Leadership
– An analysis of how your personal model reflects a practice of servant leadership is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 % – Comparison of Servant Leadership to Two Other Leadership Models
– Comparison of servant leadership to two other leadership models is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 % – Discussion of How Leaders Implement Each of the Models and How They Fit With Your Personal Model
– Discussion of how leaders implement each of the models and how they fit with your personal model is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 % – Contrast of the Effectiveness of the Models to Bring About Change in an Organization
– A contrast of the effectiveness of these models to bring about change in an organization is clearly present. Discussion is convincing, insightful, and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 % – Evaluation of How Your Personal Model of Leadership Works in Conjunction With Your Leadership Style
– An evaluation of how your personal model of leadership works in conjunction with your leadership style is clearly present. Discussion is convincing, insightful, and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 % – Action Plan Using SMART (Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Relevant, and Timely) Goals With an Evaluation of Personal Development to Work on Two Areas of Personal Improvement for Your Leadership Style
– An action plan using SMART (Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Relevant, and Timely) goals with an evaluation of personal development to work on at least two areas of personal improvement for your leadership style is presented.
20.0 % – Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 % – Thesis Development and Purpose
– Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 % – Argument Logic and Construction
– Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 % – Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
– Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 % – Format
5.0 % – Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
– All format elements are correct.
5.0 % – APA Format
– The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication.

100 – Total Weightage

P(5.m)

Prime Essay Services , written from scratch, delivered on time, at affordable rates!

CategoriesUncategorized