.At issue in the case Labriola v. Pollard Group Inc. from the second e-Activity is consideration for the formation of a contract when an employee, already employed by the employer, executes a non-compete agreement but receives no new benefit and the employer incurs no further obligations. Articulate the highlights of this argument and how it affects Labriola’s future employment possibilities. Link to e-Activity–>http://caselaw.findlaw.com/wa-supreme-court/109027…

Question description

***THERE ARE A TOTAL OF FOUR QUESTIONS**

1.Develop a hypothetical situation illustrating the formation of a contract, and identify the offer, acceptance, and consideration of this hypothetical contract.

2.Determine the enforce ability of your hypothetical situation and identify any potential legal weaknesses. In considering the situation, describe a situation in which a contract dispute might ensue.

3.From the first e-Activity, explain whether BP’s actions were intentional or negligent and discuss how you arrived at your conclusion. Link to e-Activity–>http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent….

4.At issue in the case Labriola v. Pollard Group Inc. from the second e-Activity is consideration for the formation of a contract when an employee, already employed by the employer, executes a non-compete agreement but receives no new benefit and the employer incurs no further obligations. Articulate the highlights of this argument and how it affects Labriola’s future employment possibilities. Link to e-Activity–>http://caselaw.findlaw.com/wa-supreme-court/109027…

To get a custom written paper, place an order with us!

Additional Benefits for you

♦ 24/7 customer support

♦ On-time delivery guarantee

♦ Plagiarism-free research papers

♦ Affordable and student-friendly prices

♦ Scholarly-rich custom-written papers

♦ 100% privacy and confidentiality

WE ACCEPT